Abstract Understanding the rules of Fiqh ( jurisprudence) cann't be achieved without understanding the Arabic language and knowning its syntaxes and semantic structures. As Holy Qur'an was sent in Arabic and prophet Mohammed( pbuh) spoke Arabic. Grammar then is a means to interpret language and keep one's tongue from erring in speech. As a results there appeares the strong relationship between getting a rule of Fiqh and understanding the language with its different significant semantic structure there is hardly a topic Fiqh that has no linguistic significance used by a jurist to prove his vision Vs other jurists'. So, grammar has been one of the most important evidences and pillars upon which interpreters and jurists based their opinions as grammar has been a means to interpret the meanings of language and its different semantic structures. Indeed, the science of grammar played an important role in Ibn El Araby inferences to prove and validate his juristic opinions. So, the purpose of this paper is to tackle the junstic matters in Ibn El Araby (" Ahkam El quran) in which grammar is used as an important evidence in proving it and denunciating opponents' opinions. The paper handles the role of grammar in rooting juristic rules and methods of its proning against other jurists opinion or indicating the weakness of their evidences. And it cann't be said that grammar is- necessarily- the first basic that Ibn El Araby or other junsts used its rules to select from Fiqh's rules, moreover, grammar has been a means to understand different matters extracting rules and selecting from. If using grammar as a means for understanding a specific matter is weak, using it in other semantic structures is valid for well understanding. The result is the appearance of strong related pillars used to construct jurisprudence doctrines based on connected foundation.
)
مشاهدة على SCiNiTO